Niclas Hedhman wrote: > On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 11:00 PM, Rickard Öberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I agree that this is a complete mess, and needs to be fixed up. I agree >> that the names suggested is a good way to do it (get vs find), and maybe >> we should extend this so that the current ServiceLocator is renamed to >> ServiceFinder and then have findService/findServices rather than >> lookupService/lookupServices. And *then* rename EntityFinder.find to >> findEntities and add findEntity (single), and it should be reasonably >> symmetric and semantically well-defined. > > Would that also mean that one ask for the ServiceFinder from the > Module, or still have the methods on the Module? The latter has some > advantages....
Can you expand on this? I don't have any strong opinions myself on this one. /Rickard _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
