On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 8:26 AM, Richard Wallace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In the end I think validation is a much more complex topic than most > people are willing to give it credit for. I certainly don't have all > the answers. Though I'm starting to think that what you said about the > constraints being used as "types on steriods" is the best. Constraints > should probably remain simple and not involve anything beyond the actual > value being set. For rules that involve that value as it relates to the > rest of the system, you should leave that to be checked elsewhere. See other thread on Business Rule Violations. And I agree that there are many aspects of a seemingly simple concept. Cheers Niclas _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
