Niclas Hedhman wrote: > On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 3:29 PM, Rickard Öberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Michael Hunger wrote: >> > The phases were: >> > 1) syntax check (i.e. input formats) >> > 2) mandatory checks (not null) >> > 3) property check (business validation per property) >> > 4) entity checks for depenedend property for the whole entity or even >> > encompassing related entities >> > >> > we used an reflection based mechanism to provide the validation code per >> > property or bean having the property name in the method name and giving >> > enough context needed for the validation. >> >> Sounds reasonable. Constraints in Qi4j can be used for 1-2, and some of >> 3, and should explicitly NOT be used for 4. > > Shouldn't the "Business Rule Violation" scenario be modeled using some > type of workflow?? And if so, what kind of support would we need in > Core, to allow BR workflows to be easily implemented?
Excellent question, and I have no idea :-) /Rickard _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
