On Thursday 22 May 2008 19:28, Tobias Ivarsson wrote: > UnitOfWork is still used, and you can have one or many units of work within > one transaction. The preferred number most often being one. It is also > possible, but discouraged, to have one or more transactions within one unit > of work.
I think we need to discuss (heavily) what the role of Transactions are. My initial GutFeeling is; "None for EntityStores" but that Qi4j itself may need to support being part of transactions (both in-jvm and via JTS) since it may be part of a larger system. However, if that is the case, it sounds dangerous if the EntityStores make additional assumptions around transactions. So, again, probably need a lot of discussions... Transactions (the JTA/JTS type) after all are "dinosaurs" that should just lay down and die... ;o) Cheers -- Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
