On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 6:30 PM, Emil Eifrem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I have no strong opinion, and I was the one giving Tobias/Emil the >> go-ahead. So, right now the Apache licensed entitystore-neo4j has a >> dependency on org.neo4j:neo jar, which DOES NOT contain any licensing >> information. So, RIGHT NOW, the legal situation is unclear, slightly >> in favor of a "if you use the entitystore-neo4j you get a neo4j usage >> license as well free of charge"... (I urge Neo guys to clear this up) > > Hmm, as in, the binary jar should include a LICENSE.txt or something > like that? Had no idea we had let this slip. Lemme know the "correct" > way to do that and I'll see to it immediately! As it is now; I could argue in court (with a good chance of winning such argument) that I used the Apache licensed entitystore-neo4j, which was written and provided by the Neo Technology Inc (or what your company is now called), and as there were no additional NOTICE file(s) neither in the entitystore-neo4j nor in any dependent jars of anything else, it must be all Apache licensed. So, add NOTICE in entitystore-neo4j and a LICENSE file in the neo.jar.... Cheers Niclas _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
