Georg Ragaller wrote: > Guess this is a bug, or? Well, in this case the bug is (I think) that you are trying to implement the service without using an interface. I don't think that's supported at all (nor do I think it should be supported). Can you try with a service that uses an interface instead?
Also: I'm right in the middle of refactoring the Service management for the new model, although from an API-point of view I don't think it will change. /Rickard _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
