Georg Ragaller wrote: >> What version are we talking about here? >> HEAD == unstable and can't do much right now. >> > > BLAME on me, beat me... > > I thought I was working on the latest revision, but I used 'svn co' in > my update script on a (very) old working copy instead of 'svn update' > :(((((((((. Sorry for the stolen time. > > Nevertheless your advices were very helpful. > > I'll give it a try with (a freshly :) ) checked out 0.2 and a latest HEAD.
0.2 is your best bet right now. As I said, I'm in the process of rewriting the entire runtime from scratch. It's going very well, but it is not finished yet, so YMMV. /Rickard _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
