On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 6:00 PM, Rickard Öberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Even though the bootstrap only exposes API classes, and the dependency > is internal? I thought you only got the dependency on bootstrap. Well, yes and no. Ultimate test; No dependency in pom.xml nor IDE on qi4j-core-runtime.jar. Right now that is not feasible, since we do need it "in runtime", and we need that for tests. However, that "leaks" the visibility of the runtime classes into the compiler environment as well. Ideally, the bootstrapper would even hide the classloader in runtime, but that would indeed require one bootstrapping strategy per deployment scenario. Not out of the question, but that can wait a while. Cheers Niclas _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
