On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 5:24 PM, Michael Hunger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I could clean it up if I get the information I need there from somewhere 
> (ModuleInstance is it?).
> Otherwise just do it and I look at it later.

If you need ModuleInstance, or more likely some part of it, it should
be brought forward as a usecase, and see if it makes sense to
introduce it to the SPI. The intent down the line is that no code
depends on Runtime.


Cheers
Niclas

_______________________________________________
qi4j-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev

Reply via email to