I don't think it is reasonable for an entitystore to access the store of an entity state. As stated previously by Rickard there is only one EntityStore per Module and so per EntityComposite. What the RMI store tries to do is to distribute/delegate the storage operation of the entities to the different entity stores of the entity composites. (But only for prepare, the other operations are performed with the default entity store thats injected (in this case a MemoryStore).
Perhaps just using a new (server side) uow to persist the states that were transferred via the wire would be enough? If the objects originated from this remote store and their state is transferred back, its reasonable to argue that the currently injected store is responsible for persisting them. Michael _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
