On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 2:18 PM, Rickard Öberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > One more thing: maybe it would be best to put all Qi4j-specific paths > under /qi4j, as we might be expanding them later and the fewer top-paths > we use, the better. One thing I am definitely looking forward to is to > have /qi4j/view which would be a HTML-esque version of the application > visualizer (which is looking better and better btw!)
True, since we probably want to be able to mount this on the same port as client code. Cheers Niclas _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
