Michael Hunger wrote: > These guys are so crazy they crammed the idea with everything imaginable :) > So we'll see about the promises about speed and stability. > But where is the qi4j support?
As Toni pointed out the plain Java support is a very good start. But there are certainly things that could be added explicitly, like code completion for Concerns. Example, when writing @Concers(_) in a class (the _ is the cursor), it should be possible to list all possible Concerns in the codebase which applies (this includes generic ones and type specific ones, considering the type of the Composite it is being added to). These kinds of integrations would be very neat. I have no idea how hard it is to do these kinds of things though. Would be a nice project if someone wants to pick it up though. /Rickard _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
