hello, > WDYT?
Personally, I'm not experienced enough to know the nuances you go in to, but having the option of erring more on the non-mutable side would be very interesting to me; I think I fall into the "write it so it (mostly) can't go wrong, and then later optimize" side sorta like i guess "3rd+ normal form, then later denormalize" camp philosophically. sincerely. _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
