On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 7:26 PM, Raoul Duke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hello, > >> WDYT? > > Personally, I'm not experienced enough to know the nuances you go in > to, but having the option of erring more on the non-mutable side would > be very interesting to me; I think I fall into the "write it so it > (mostly) can't go wrong, and then later optimize" side sorta like i > guess "3rd+ normal form, then later denormalize" camp philosophically.
Yeah, the Computer Science community has long debated the equivalents of whether is knife is useful or not; Powerful but deadly. I can't say that I have strong discipline in Immutability myself, but I think I would appreciate a world where I am forced to behave. Others think differently. Well... Let's see what others think... Cheers Niclas _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
