On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 10:02 AM, Rickard Öberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The way they deal with what happens when the schema changes and broken > databases, i.e. keep the transaction list and reapply. This would be > useful for server-server synchronization as well. You just doubled++ the storage requirements... I guess that there are plenty of applications where this is Ok, but we can't prescribe this as a "must". Cheers Niclas _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
