Niclas Hedhman wrote: > On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 10:02 AM, Rickard Öberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> The way they deal with what happens when the schema changes and broken >> databases, i.e. keep the transaction list and reapply. This would be >> useful for server-server synchronization as well. > > You just doubled++ the storage requirements... I guess that there are > plenty of applications where this is Ok, but we can't prescribe this > as a "must".
I know, it would be more like an optional service, if you want the synchronization and data migration features. /Rickard _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
