Niklas Uhrberg wrote: > Seems like we have the same understanding. > > But lets not forget that I want to have the possibility to qualify the > associations not only with values like dates but also with entities, > this is a very common need. > Don't know if this is at odds with using values, but they typically > don't contain references to entities.... > Having the qualifying entities attached to the association makes this > very pedagogical (as opposed to just being traversed in a chain to the > associated entity)
We were talking about allowing ValueComposites have references too, so that should be fine. > PS. I note that my English spelling is very different (worse) when > writing email in a hurry, really disturbing. I can't believe that I > don't discover all the errors immediately... DS. You're too much of a perfectionist ;-) But you knew that already... In any case, great progress on this important issue!! /Rickard _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
