Niclas Hedhman wrote: > On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 11:14 AM, Rickard Öberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I've been reading more articles on the topic, and I now agree with your >> earlier suggestion that it should be "Qualifier", so the previous >> example would become: >> This seems to match the terminology descriptions I have found so far, >> and how you have described it. Makes sense? > > To me, yes. > >> is that in the latter case Vendor is hardcoded to Company, and if >> Qualifier is used the Vendor Qualifier can be used with other kinds of >> Entities. > > Ok. So, the pro is the "generality" and the con is the "general name > lookup"... which you try to show how to remove in one post. > Btw, what would then the two methods in Qualifier be? > > entity() and qualifier() ??
Something like that, yeah. Better names? /Rickard _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
