Niclas Hedhman wrote: > Hi, > I think it was Rickard who pointed me to this interview, and I found > it extremely(!) interesting. And it was "cute" that Qi4j was > mentioned, but that's not the point why you should see it and listen > very, very carefully. > > http://www.infoq.com/interviews/greg-young-ddd
Yeah, this interview is one of the reasons I'm really not sure how to do the client/server communication, and also how to expose state. He suggests that the domain is *write-only*, and I sort of gets his argument but it at the same time seems a little inconvenient. I still, to this date, has not seen a good solution for where and how to expose the domain data to the client, although I think I've seen a thousand discussions on DTO's. The question of "how" is very rarely resolved in these discussions, so I think it's something that needs more thinking. /Rickard _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
