Niclas Hedhman wrote: > Correct. The GUM (Grand Unified Model) will fail. I have seen it > myself, and I am sure many people who likes DDD are also burned from > such experiences. Qi4j's mission in this space should be to find a way > to make multiple models in different contexts easier. Obviously Greg > think that we are doing something right, or he wouldn't mentioned it. > Evans have high hopes and wished he could spend cycles on it (he says > he is swamped)...
I agree on this, that we should *assume* that GUM cannot work, so therefore make it easy to have many models. How to do this, I don't know yet. /Rickard _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
