On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 23:58, Rickard Öberg <[email protected]> wrote: > What do you guys think about this? Does it seem like a decent compromise?
+1 Although, I have one question. What is the order of the added concern/sideeffects at runtime? Regards, Edward Yakop _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
