Hi,
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 10:18 PM, Niclas Hedhman <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 8:39 PM, Tonny Kohar <[email protected]> wrote: > >> What is the best/recommended way to traverse the model. So far as I am >> understand there are 3 ways to do >> - using the core-runtime structure. For this one I am stuck at >> EntitiesInstance because it does not have methods that return list of >> entities, It have method that return entity but I must supply the id, >> etc. which I do not have, I want to get all the entities > > Never use core-runtime. It may not be stable at all. Sure no problem. > >> - using the core-spi structucture. All is only stub, nothing is implemented >> here >> - using my own visitor, same technique like the visualizer doing, > > Isn't these two the same thing?? Yes, it is the same things. It is me who is thought wrongly about the design. I thought the interface will be implemented eg: - ModuleDetailDescriptor (Visualizer) is implementing ModuleDescriptor (Core SPI) - LayerDetailDescriptor (Visualizer) is implementing LayerDescriptor (Core SPI) but they are not. Anyways, I got it now. >> which means reinvent the wheel > > Well, each visitor implementation has different needs, so a lot > depends on what you want to do whether the visitors will end up being > similar. Yes each implementation certainly have different needs. Just suggestion, do you think is a good idea to provide default (traverse all in structure order or type order) as part of library ? Cheers Tonny Kohar -- KIYUT imagine, design, create ... http://www.kiyut.com _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
