On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 1:14 AM, Tonny Kohar <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yes each implementation certainly have different needs. Just > suggestion, do you think is a good idea to provide default (traverse > all in structure order or type order) as part of library ? The only other (beside NoOp) implementation that I can think of that is reasonably common, would be that the base class keep track of 'current position' of the 'walker'. Perhaps that is low overhead enough to be part of the standard adapter. Rickard? Cheers Niclas -- http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
