I assume so. As I wrote before. I had to cancel the concurrent Part of the 
AbstractES-Test for Swift as it didn't return 
at all. I think when canceling the test the store became corrupt.
So the question is - does our commit protocol help us there? Perhaps have a 
"transactional" wrapper around the 
RandomAccessFile that buffers writes until a commit command comes? This will 
become interesting with multiple threads 
but I assume a thread local buffer would help there and a synchronized write of 
all the committed buffers.

Michael

Am 01.03.2009 3:37 Uhr, schrieb Niclas Hedhman:
> On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 6:21 PM, Michael Hunger<[email protected]>  wrote:
>> MacBook Air with MacOS X 10.5
>> 1.6.0_07-b06-153
>
> Could it be that the store is a corrupt one? And that it stays corrupt
> since it doesn't get chance to cleanup...
>
> Cheers
> Niclas


_______________________________________________
qi4j-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev

Reply via email to