On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 11:56 AM, Rickard Öberg <[email protected]> wrote: > Niclas Hedhman wrote: >> >> On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Michael Hunger <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> I just had this conversation with Rickard about the above which bothered >>> me >>> for quite a while now: >> >> It is really, really hard to follow Instant Messaging as a >> third-party, but if I understand it correctly, there will be methods >> to get hold of a Collection instead of being a Collection. >> >> Sounds like a big step forward; Composition instead of Inheritance. Me >> Like! >> >> And the ManyAssoc is not implementing Iterable either? > > That's open, but I suppose there's no need for it to be iterable if we have > ManyAssociation.toList()!
ManyAssociation.toList() ?? Doesn't ManyAssoc need to have toCollection() and each of the SetAssoc and ListAssoc have the toSet() and toList()?? Cheers Niclas -- http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
