First we'll start with the current
ManyAssoc, ListAssoc and SetAssoc.
Later we can perhaps switch to have annotation based semantics.
Michael
Am 25.03.2009 5:20 Uhr, schrieb Niclas Hedhman:
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Rickard Öberg<[email protected]> wrote:
One idea is to skip ListAssoc and SetAssoc entirely, and only have
ManyAssociation with toCollection, toSet and toList. Maybe even toIterable.
Have we not had this discussion before? The semantics for List and Set
are not necessarily compatible. How is that going to be resolved?
Cheers
Niclas
_______________________________________________
qi4j-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
