Niclas Hedhman wrote:
The ID passed at that level is an opaque String? Would that create problem for 'mapping'-like stores?
It would. But if we split the responsibilities of storing and managing type this could maybe be fixed. If EntityState did not include EntityType, but it *is* provided EntityType on prepare(), then it could work I think. Maybe. Not sure at all...
Yes, I think that would make sense. In fact, UoW is fairly overloaded and perhaps there are other things it does that perhaps should be broken out as well.
Most likely! /Rickard _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
