Michael Hunger wrote:
I agree. EntityState doesn't have to know about the type as it ist just
a dumb state holder.
State gets relevant when used at the client.
The version of then entity is included in the state. Why not also the
schemaVersion of the type at the time of storage?
So our QI ist just the UID without the type (as it is now?).
Then the UID really must be unique over all entities, right?
Seems a nice challenge for mapping stores :)
Yeah... hm... needs thinking...
/Rickard
_______________________________________________
qi4j-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
