Niclas Hedhman wrote:
So, I am not that convinced of the "merge"-talks either.
In fact, I am getting more and more into the notion that "mutations"
should be placed in stand-alone processes, in a such a way that they
are queueable and re-executable (idempotent).
With the basic operations being setProperty(value), setAssociation(ref),
addManyAssociation(idx, ref) and removeManyAssociation(ref), I think
they will be idempotent. set are trivially idempotent, addMA is also,
since the association is defined with set semantics, and removeMA is
also idempotent (removeManyAssociation(idx) would not be).
/Rickard
_______________________________________________
qi4j-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
