> I wish I could take credit for that, but that is the essence of STM's. > Check out http://www.xstm.net/ or http://sites.google.com/site/deucestm/ > STM for Xi4J looks more like the former since it would only be done for real > domain objects while deuce tries to apply STM to plain objects.
also, in the general world of JVM languges (i know you folk are sticking with Java the language, but this might still be interesting :-), check out Clojure for another take on STM. sincerely. _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
