Rickard Öberg wrote:
Result in the following persistent format:
<vorg.qi4j.api.value.ValueCompositeTest-SomeValue>
<pcqEnW7hSlF-uZQFaAwnglkPfxe4/>
<pHC1fHU6i-WoHt6SwiIITETg4OeU><list></list></pHC1fHU6i-WoHt6SwiIITETg4OeU>
<pyl71lJnuDnp_NiusytLDMQfgR9U></pyl71lJnuDnp_NiusytLDMQfgR9U>
<p9DDT42ejJG4hdAYky7gt-StQofE></p9DDT42ejJG4hdAYky7gt-StQofE>
<p4UsCraqBNWR7E3nAM6eRE7YukRI><list>
<item><vorg.qi4j.api.value.ValueCompositeTest-AnotherValue>
<pK1aNaBM9vbnHpQ8fhkA_Vmb9v8M></pK1aNaBM9vbnHpQ8fhkA_Vmb9v8M>
</vorg.qi4j.api.value.ValueCompositeTest-AnotherValue></item>
</list>
</p4UsCraqBNWR7E3nAM6eRE7YukRI>
<pNNLfKkDxQt2WNCYyW7U5EULzRig>42</pNNLfKkDxQt2WNCYyW7U5EULzRig>
</vorg.qi4j.api.value.ValueCompositeTest-SomeValue>
I've implemented more of this now, and have removed the "v" levels. The
base string is therefore not XML, as it becomes:
<pcqEnW7hSlF-uZQFaAwnglkPfxe4/>
<pHC1fHU6i-WoHt6SwiIITETg4OeU><list></list></pHC1fHU6i-WoHt6SwiIITETg4OeU>
<pyl71lJnuDnp_NiusytLDMQfgR9U></pyl71lJnuDnp_NiusytLDMQfgR9U>
<p9DDT42ejJG4hdAYky7gt-StQofE></p9DDT42ejJG4hdAYky7gt-StQofE>
<p4UsCraqBNWR7E3nAM6eRE7YukRI><list>
<item>
<pK1aNaBM9vbnHpQ8fhkA_Vmb9v8M></pK1aNaBM9vbnHpQ8fhkA_Vmb9v8M>
</item>
</list>
</p4UsCraqBNWR7E3nAM6eRE7YukRI>
<pNNLfKkDxQt2WNCYyW7U5EULzRig>42</pNNLfKkDxQt2WNCYyW7U5EULzRig>
This is closer to the XStream-format actually, which I've had good
experience with before. Given the type information it should be trivial
to prettyprint the above into human-readable formats.
/Rickard
_______________________________________________
qi4j-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
