On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Rickard Öberg <[email protected]> wrote:
> <pcqEnW7hSlF-uZQFaAwnglkPfxe4/> > <pHC1fHU6i-WoHt6SwiIITETg4OeU><list></list></pHC1fHU6i-WoHt6SwiIITETg4OeU> > <pyl71lJnuDnp_NiusytLDMQfgR9U></pyl71lJnuDnp_NiusytLDMQfgR9U> > <p9DDT42ejJG4hdAYky7gt-StQofE></p9DDT42ejJG4hdAYky7gt-StQofE> > <p4UsCraqBNWR7E3nAM6eRE7YukRI><list> > <item> > <pK1aNaBM9vbnHpQ8fhkA_Vmb9v8M></pK1aNaBM9vbnHpQ8fhkA_Vmb9v8M> > </item> > </list> > </p4UsCraqBNWR7E3nAM6eRE7YukRI> > <pNNLfKkDxQt2WNCYyW7U5EULzRig>42</pNNLfKkDxQt2WNCYyW7U5EULzRig> > > This is closer to the XStream-format actually, which I've had good > experience with before. Given the type information it should be trivial to > prettyprint the above into human-readable formats. Are you saying that the above is not human-readable?? And I have heard that XML is not only human-readable but even human-editable... ;-) Cheers -- Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
