Rickard Öberg wrote:
Georg Ragaller wrote:
Would'nt it be better to specify the migration rules as diffs (or
better patches) from one version to its direct successor, plus the
version history,
and let the migrator service determine which patches to apply in the
correct order?
Yes, that is what I had in mind, but I realize that "onVersion"
doesn't show that. It should be "toVersion", and then it should work
exactly as you say.
Good, but should'nt it be something like
"betweenVersions("predecessor","successor"), i.e. one edge in the history?
Georg
_______________________________________________
qi4j-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
