Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 6:52 PM, Kent Sølvsten <[email protected]> wrote:
The only time I have seen a weird versioning scheme like George's was a
situation where 1.0.1 was "our product customized for customer 1" and 1.1
was "our product customized for customer 2", but I believe it is ok, if
support for that is left out of Qi4J.
What Georg is talking about;
Jan - Release 1.0
March - Release 1.1
April - VIP customer of 1.0 wants bug 123 fixed (but don't want
upgrade). Released as 1.0.1
June - 1.2 is released with bug123 fixed as well.
Assuming for a second that the bug fix requires a domain model change
(could be very small).
I don't see this as unrealistic. Question is if we wan to aim for this
straight away, or put it in later...
Cheers
That's it.
Cheers
Georg
_______________________________________________
qi4j-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
