Ping!!! I suggest that we remove UnitOfWork.remove() for now, and if there are strong reasons to bring it back we can do that later.
WDYT? On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 4:49 PM, Niclas Hedhman <[email protected]> wrote: > Rickard, > > There is a difference between uow.remove( entity ) and entity.remove(). > > If the entity is created within the same uow session that calls the > uow.remove(), then there will be an exception that the entity doesn't > exist. But calling entity.remove() works. I think it is due to > UnitOfWorkInstance.remove( entity ) doesn't remove the instanceCache > entry, but not totally sure. > > Another question is whether we should have both or not... I am not > convinced either way. Well, looking more closer it seems that the > concerns of who does what is a bit mixed up. > > I think this is a fix we need for 1.0. Cheers -- Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
