Niclas Hedhman wrote:
Ping!!!

I suggest that we remove UnitOfWork.remove() for now, and if there are
strong reasons to bring it back we can do that later.

Like you noted, it's the other way round: UoW.remove() should be there and LifeCycle.remove() should be removed.

/Rickard

_______________________________________________
qi4j-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev

Reply via email to