On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Stanislav Muhametsin <[email protected]> wrote: > No "bubble-gum-solutions" (not sure if you are familiar with the term, > basically it means hacks), but the code is just really really hard to read > in a few places.
Ok, I suggest; I will see if there are any obvious things that may affect compatibility and adjust if needed. Internals can be improved in "background"... Cheers -- Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
