Sure we can try that... No immediate hurry. Want this 1.2 out the door first.
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Stanislav Muhametsin <[email protected]> wrote: > Quoting Niclas Hedhman <[email protected]>: > >> On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Stanislav Muhametsin >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Yeah, I agree that Query API should be revised for 1.3. Did you plan to >>> hold >>> the main discussion over this mail-list or some other way? >> >> Mailing list is preferred, but if we can get a productivity boost by >> other means then that is possible too. I am not too hopeful of that >> though, considering our geographic dispersion. >> > > If we manage to find a time when we all (apparently so far Rickard + Niclas > + myself) are awake, I'd say Skype is *the* best way for this kind of thing. > Its support for multi-user conversations is superior to anything else I've > encountered, and indeed, we have had our Skype discussion room with work > collegues running for 2 years in a row now, without a single difficulty or > bug. > > My main object to mailing list is that it is too slow and clumsy if we > really want to have a good conversation and idea-exploration talk. Of course > no big decision is made without the support from mailing list, but the > brainstorm IMO could be held better in IM conversations. > > > _______________________________________________ > qi4j-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev > -- Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
