On 2010-11-09 05.31, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
I recall that when we started out with looking at RDF implementations, we chose Sesame primarily for "community" reasons, and that their development process was much more open. This is likely to change now, and it will be interesting to see alternate implementations of our RDF things on top of Jena, to compare performance. And with an Apache development model, the community members should also become much more accessible.
Interesting. If they get their act together community-wise, and have good performance and is easy to integrate, why not?
/Rickard _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
