Thanks for your feedback Rickard... I sometimes feel like OSGi is like the java portlet spec, good ideas but difficult to execute.
phil On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 7:00 PM, Rickard Öberg <[email protected]>wrote: > On 2010-11-23 10.45, Niclas Hedhman wrote: > >> Gang, >> to what level is OSGi interesting to this current community? >> > > For myself I've given up. I tried porting Streamflow to OSGi, and it didn't > work out. We had problems with packaging (Maven), deployment (Glassfish > hangs), and 3rd party libraries (classloading, threadlocals, statics, etc. > that screw things up). Also Glassfish doesn't have any decent admin tools > for OSGi. So we quit, and now we do plugins through REST SPI's instead, > which works fine, and is more flexible actually, for our usecase. > > So, if you want to do it, go ahead, but I'm not gonna try again. > > /Rickard > > > _______________________________________________ > qi4j-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev >
_______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
