On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Rickard Öberg <[email protected]> wrote:
> One issue is that changing "addServices" to "services" will force > developers to update all their assemblers. We could solve this by > having "addServices" be there as @Deprecated, and just let it delegate > to "services", and then remove it in the next version. Good suggestion, but let's put it to the test; * IF you object to addXyz() to be removed for 1.3, SHOUT NOW!!! Cheers -- Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java I live here; http://tinyurl.com/3xugrbk I work here; http://tinyurl.com/24svnvk I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
