2011/3/10 Niclas Hedhman <[email protected]>: > On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Rickard Öberg <[email protected]> wrote: > >> One issue is that changing "addServices" to "services" will force >> developers to update all their assemblers. We could solve this by >> having "addServices" be there as @Deprecated, and just let it delegate >> to "services", and then remove it in the next version. > > Good suggestion, but let's put it to the test; > > * IF you object to addXyz() to be removed for 1.3, SHOUT NOW!!!
Fyi, I've added this now, with add* as @Deprecated syntactic sugar. Noone shouts -> remove. /Rickard _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
