[
http://issues.ops4j.org/browse/QI-341?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13984#action_13984
]
Niclas Hedhman commented on QI-341:
-----------------------------------
Once JSR-311 makes it to JDK we will need to support that too.
> Support JodaTime natively in the toJSON() system.
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: QI-341
> URL: http://issues.ops4j.org/browse/QI-341
> Project: Qi4j
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Core Runtime
> Affects Versions: 1.2
> Reporter: Niclas Hedhman
>
> Using java.util.Date is generally a bad practice. JodaTime is the current
> strong contender for good time handling, and I think we should support
> serialization from/to JodaTime and some specified JSON level format, for
> instance ISO-8601 in the write case and perhaps a bit more flexible on the
> read case.
> Alternatively, we need to make this serialization mechanism pluggable, so
> that one can add new types to be supported.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.ops4j.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
_______________________________________________
qi4j-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
