Considering what you've said, the site doesn't look all that bad at all. Just one weird glitch: when I select some text, the selected text looks really blurry and unclear. Does anyone else have same problem? I'm using FF 12 on Win7 64bit.
Quoting Niclas Hedhman <[email protected]>:
Gang, Please review http://www2.qi4j.org and provide feedback. A few things can be pre-empted; 1. Yes, the design isn't perfect, but we don't have a design guru that has enough cycles to throw at it. 2. Content. Yes, there are a lot of content that is not written. It never was, partly due to Sitevision having too high barrier for someone who wanted to create documentation. So, what is at play here; 1. Documents are edited in AsciiDoc format[1], straight into our source repository, typically in src/docs in parallel to src/main to point out that the developer should write the documentation as well. 2. The Documentation.groovy build tool in buildSrc/ calls the AsciiDoc, DocBook and DocBook XSL toolchains to create statically generated web pages. 3. There is a script on server that pulls GitHub, builds the website and copies the result to the mounted URL. This script is activated by a POST request and could be added to GitHub's hooks, I think. Finally one question; What other excuse(s) can developer now have for not writing documentation? [1] http://www.methods.co.nz/asciidoc/userguide.html Cheers -- Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java I live here; http://tinyurl.com/3xugrbk I work here; http://tinyurl.com/6a2pl4j I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
_______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
