On 5/6/12 15:36 , Niclas Hedhman wrote:
Gang,
Please review http://www2.qi4j.org and provide feedback. A few things
can be pre-empted;
1. Yes, the design isn't perfect, but we don't have a design guru
that has enough cycles to throw at it.
2. Content. Yes, there are a lot of content that is not written. It
never was, partly due to Sitevision having too high barrier for
someone who wanted to create documentation.
Basically, I think this is the right way to go. What is up there now
looks ok, and I agree that this will significantly lower the barrier for
writing new content.
My main excuse now for not writing content is that I no longer use Qi4j
in my own projects, and have to actively work on one of the main
competitors in the persistence space, Spring Data.
/Rickard
_______________________________________________
qi4j-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
