George Gwilt writes: > > Any chance of eptr2wda converting a definition into assembler? > > There might be. I had thought of this. But what format would be useful? A > direct window definition, much like Easyptr menus, would still leave the question > of space needed for the working definition. On the other hand, producing code > to be assembled using Qmac, or GWASS macros might be more to the point. Which > should it be? > > Any ideas?
The former - Qmac format - was what I had in mind. Easier to read than macros, and flexible enough to tweak by hand. Per _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List
