----- Original Message ----- From: "John Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 11:09 AM Subject: [ql-users] Quanta
> I like the way all the ideas about what Quanta should be in the future > are developing. > Haven't we heard it all before? > Believe me, none of the proposals are original, they have all been > discussed and muted, in some cases, several times. > The last thing the committee wants is a list of items for future > discussion. > What is wanted is someone who is willing and able to stimulate some > action. > This, it must be admitted will be impossible with the present > committee. Attitudes there are too deeply ingrained. > To put it simply, they have lost the plot. > So too have the members of Quanta. > There has been little or no evidence of any interest in what the > committee are doing and as a consequence the committee have shown very > little interest in what the members are doing. > Perhaps Quanta has the sort of committee it deserves. > > Quanta for many years was the backbone of the QL scene and it could be > again. > You have three months to sort out the mess, and by that I mean, find > the right people, elect them, then support them > Launching QL2005 could be a start. > > John Taylor > > _______________________________________________ > QL-Users Mailing List > http://www.quanta.org.uk/mailing.htm John Taylor is right. We need new keen blood. I propose that all those who have been making suggestions for Quanta should be put forward as committee members so that we have an active vibrant Quanta committee. _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
