Phoebus Dokos writes:

<>
> No the idea of "colour drivers" does not exist in freeQDOS in the sense
> that it exists on SMSQ/e or QDOS... freeQDOS is only an OS; the screen
> driver is "pluggable" to it (so in theory it could use SMSQ/e drivers) and
> there's no PE (although it will be able to use the stand-alone PE).
> Colours, graphics etc in the current incarnation are handled much like
> UN*X by a graphics "server" of sorts on which you plug any GUI on top...
> freeQDOS is in essence (currently that is) a Minerva core with a lot of
> stuff removed and even more added... currently it aims at running on Qx0
> machines, the Amiga, the Atari and the SGC (and possibly on ColdFire
> processors... just got the PortASM/68K for free thanks to Dave that showed
> me a link that Nasta showed him :-) ) taking advantage of all the extra
> facilities on these processors with a full cli (sash currently). It
> currently has support for FP commands (ergo it is extremely fast on FPU
> systems) and uses a lot of code originally developed for QDOS Classic...
> and the whole package is created and maintained using entirely free
> software Milestone edition 0.001a has just been reached (ie it booted
> under the Q40) but not much else except complete conversion of the core
> over to gwass from Q-Mac. Due to the lack of time it has progressed slowly
> over the last year but work on it continues... the reason why I do not
> talk about it is simply because it isn't ready... and for all purposes it
> is now still vapourware... so consider it non-existent :-)
<>

It seems to me that we need Yet Another Version Of Qdos [YAVOQ] like
we need an eighth hole in the head! What is the thinking behind it? Or is
it just  an expression of pure tribalism?

Per

_______________________________________________
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm

Reply via email to