I did the same. I am sure there are different M$ Word spellcheck setups, as mine found "rong" and "shure" to be incorrect spellings.
I asked it to look up "chequer" using the online dictionary feature in outlook, and it actually found cheque, saying it was a alternative to check in UK finance terminology. So, just as we always thought - pea seas are crap :-)) Darren. -----Original Message----- From: Dilwyn Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 June 2005 09:41 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [ql-users] Spelin' Just out of curiousity I tried it in Word (no QTYPon this machine at work). No objection apart from the word 'chequer'. The text contains mostly words which are correct in a spell checking sense but which some of Geoff's programs might violently object to, a bit like correcting a Welshman's English perhaps! He he. Dilwyn Jones > > From: John Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2005/06/20 Mon PM 07:39:04 GMT > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [ql-users] Spelin' > > I think Geoff might like this. > > > Eye halve a spelling chequer > It came with my pea sea > It plainly marques four my revue > Miss steaks eye kin knot sea. > Eye strike a quay and type a word > And weight four it two say > Weather eye am rong oar rite > It shows me strait aweigh. > As soon as a mist ache is maid > It nose bee four two long > And eye can put the error rite > Its rare lea ever rong. > Eye halve run this poem threw it > I am shure your pleased two no > Its letter perfect awl the weigh > My chequer tolled me sew! > > John Taylor _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
