Hi Wolfgang,

I have only had 1 request for an update on SMSQ/E on eprom.

I was going start using 4Mb eproms, but due to personal problems, I have 
not got around to issuing any updates on eproms.

Probably makes sense to use larger chips, to give the flexibilty to the 
operating system authors.

Derek

Wolfgang Lenerz wrote:
> On 31 Oct 2005 at 20:26, Fabrizio Diversi wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>>I personally do not care absolutely about the smsq/e Rom version for my Qx0s, 
>>i do no see any reason why i should burn eproms all the times i upgrade my 
>>q60 smsq version , also because smsqe load perfectly into q60 ram in one 
>>second.
> 
> 
> OK, there seems to be an overwhelming majot=rity for that opinion, at least 
> here on the list.
> 
> What about the traders (especially Derek) - how many requests for EPROMS do 
> they get?
> 
> 
>>I also vote for the "Home" extension included in official smsqe.
> 
> 
> 
> Ok, so there will soon be a version 3.12 of SMSQE...
> 
> Marcel also had another good idea: He would like the home directory for an 
> Sbasic program to be changed every time a new program was loaded into it.
> As it wasn't foreseen by me, originally, that the home dir and file for a 
> program could ever change, I'll have some work to do on that.
> 
> Wolfgang
> ----------------------------------------
> www.scp-paulet-lenerz.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> QL-Users Mailing List
> http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
> 
> 
_______________________________________________
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm

Reply via email to